mcp-tools vs paste — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of mcp-tools and paste. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | mcp-tools | paste |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 67.0/100 | 60.8/100 |
| Grade | C | C+ |
| Stars | 0 | 0 |
| Category | infrastructure | uncategorized |
| Security | 0 | 80 |
| Compliance | 100 | N/A |
| Maintenance | 1 | 50 |
| Documentation | 1 | 40 |
| EU AI Act Risk | minimal | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
mcp-tools leads with a trust score of 67.0/100 compared to paste's 60.8/100 (a 6.2-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
paste leads on security with a score of 80/100 compared to mcp-tools's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
paste demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
paste has better documentation (40/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
mcp-tools has 0 GitHub stars while paste has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose mcp-tools if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Choose paste if you need:
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from mcp-tools to paste (or vice versa)
When migrating between mcp-tools and paste, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: mcp-tools (infrastructure) and paste (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the mcp-tools safety report and paste safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: mcp-tools has 0 stars and paste has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-10-30 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.