MCP-UI Widgets vs agent-scan — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of MCP-UI Widgets and agent-scan. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

MCP-UI Widgets scores 70.2/100 (D) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. MCP-UI Widgets leads by 70.2 points. MCP-UI Widgets is a infrastructure agent with 50 stars, Nerq Verified. agent-scan is a infrastructure agent with 1,981 stars.
70.2
D verified
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars50
Sourcepulsemcp
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,981
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance97
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric MCP-UI Widgets agent-scan
Trust Score70.2/1000.0/100
GradeDA
Stars501,981
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
SecurityN/A0
ComplianceN/A97
Maintenance01
Documentation01
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

MCP-UI Widgets leads with a trust score of 70.2/100 compared to agent-scan's 0.0/100 (a 70.2-point difference). However, agent-scan has stronger community adoption (1,981 vs 50 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. MCP-UI Widgets scores N/A and agent-scan scores 0 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

agent-scan demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agent-scan has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

MCP-UI Widgets has 50 GitHub stars while agent-scan has 1,981. agent-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose MCP-UI Widgets if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose agent-scan if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,981 vs 50 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from MCP-UI Widgets to agent-scan (or vice versa)

When migrating between MCP-UI Widgets and agent-scan, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: MCP-UI Widgets (infrastructure) and agent-scan (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the MCP-UI Widgets safety report and agent-scan safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: MCP-UI Widgets has 50 stars and agent-scan has 1,981. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
MCP-UI Widgets Safety Report agent-scan Safety Report MCP-UI Widgets Alternatives agent-scan Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MCP-UI Widgets or agent-scan?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, MCP-UI Widgets has a trust score of 70.2/100 (D) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A). The 70.2-point difference suggests MCP-UI Widgets has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do MCP-UI Widgets and agent-scan compare on security?
MCP-UI Widgets has a security score of N/A/100 and agent-scan scores 0/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. MCP-UI Widgets's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while agent-scan's is 97/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use MCP-UI Widgets or agent-scan?
The choice depends on your requirements. MCP-UI Widgets (infrastructure, 50 stars) and agent-scan (infrastructure, 1,981 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, MCP-UI Widgets scores 70.2/100 and agent-scan scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (0 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-19 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy