mcp vs react-responsive-modal — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of mcp and react-responsive-modal. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

mcp scores 62.1/100 (B) while react-responsive-modal scores 0.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. mcp leads by 62.1 points. mcp is a infrastructure tool with 1,350 stars. react-responsive-modal is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.
62.1
B
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,350
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
0.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric mcp react-responsive-modal
Trust Score62.1/1000.0/100
GradeBC
Stars1,3500
Categoryinfrastructureuncategorized
Security1N/A
Compliance87100
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation1N/A
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

mcp leads with a trust score of 62.1/100 compared to react-responsive-modal's 0.0/100 (a 62.1-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. mcp scores 1 and react-responsive-modal scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. mcp: 1, react-responsive-modal: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. mcp: 1, react-responsive-modal: N/A.

Community & Adoption

mcp has 1,350 GitHub stars while react-responsive-modal has 0. mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,350 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose react-responsive-modal if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from mcp to react-responsive-modal (or vice versa)

When migrating between mcp and react-responsive-modal, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: mcp (infrastructure) and react-responsive-modal (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the mcp safety report and react-responsive-modal safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: mcp has 1,350 stars and react-responsive-modal has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
mcp Safety Report react-responsive-modal Safety Report mcp Alternatives react-responsive-modal Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, mcp or react-responsive-modal?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, mcp has a trust score of 62.1/100 (B) while react-responsive-modal scores 0.0/100 (C). The 62.1-point difference suggests mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do mcp and react-responsive-modal compare on security?
mcp has a security score of 1/100 and react-responsive-modal scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. mcp's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while react-responsive-modal's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use mcp or react-responsive-modal?
The choice depends on your requirements. mcp (infrastructure, 1,350 stars) and react-responsive-modal (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, mcp scores 62.1/100 and react-responsive-modal scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy