MCPShell for Android vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of MCPShell for Android and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

MCPShell for Android scores 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. MCPShell for Android leads by 63.5 points. MCPShell for Android is a uncategorized tool with 1 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure tool with 1,610 stars.
63.5
E
Categoryuncategorized
Stars1
Sourcepulsemcp
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric MCPShell for Android toolhive
Trust Score63.5/1000.0/100
GradeEA
Stars11,610
Categoryuncategorizedinfrastructure
SecurityN/A1
ComplianceN/A85
MaintenanceN/A1
DocumentationN/A1
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

MCPShell for Android leads with a trust score of 63.5/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 63.5-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 1 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. MCPShell for Android scores N/A and toolhive scores 1 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. MCPShell for Android: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. MCPShell for Android: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Community & Adoption

MCPShell for Android has 1 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose MCPShell for Android if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 1 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from MCPShell for Android to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between MCPShell for Android and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: MCPShell for Android (uncategorized) and toolhive (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the MCPShell for Android safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: MCPShell for Android has 1 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
MCPShell for Android Safety Report toolhive Safety Report MCPShell for Android Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MCPShell for Android or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, MCPShell for Android has a trust score of 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 63.5-point difference suggests MCPShell for Android has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do MCPShell for Android and toolhive compare on security?
MCPShell for Android has a security score of N/A/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. MCPShell for Android's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use MCPShell for Android or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. MCPShell for Android (uncategorized, 1 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, MCPShell for Android scores 63.5/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 1), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-29 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy