MinerU vs ssalmuk — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of MinerU and ssalmuk. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

MinerU scores 80.4/100 (B) while ssalmuk scores 64.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. MinerU leads by 16.4 points. MinerU is a data agent with 54,130 stars, Nerq Verified. ssalmuk is a data agent with 0 stars.
80.4
B verified
Categorydata
Stars54,130
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
64.0
C
Categorydata
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric MinerU ssalmuk
Trust Score80.4/10064.0/100
GradeBC
Stars54,1300
Categorydatadata
Security10
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

MinerU leads with a trust score of 80.4/100 compared to ssalmuk's 64.0/100 (a 16.4-point difference). MinerU scores higher on security (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

MinerU leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to ssalmuk's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

MinerU demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

MinerU has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

MinerU has 54,130 GitHub stars while ssalmuk has 0. MinerU has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose MinerU if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Larger community (54,130 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose ssalmuk if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from MinerU to ssalmuk (or vice versa)

When migrating between MinerU and ssalmuk, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: MinerU (data) and ssalmuk (data) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the MinerU safety report and ssalmuk safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: MinerU has 54,130 stars and ssalmuk has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
MinerU Safety Report ssalmuk Safety Report MinerU Alternatives ssalmuk Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MinerU or ssalmuk?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, MinerU has a trust score of 80.4/100 (B) while ssalmuk scores 64.0/100 (C). The 16.4-point difference suggests MinerU has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do MinerU and ssalmuk compare on security?
MinerU has a security score of 1/100 and ssalmuk scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. MinerU's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while ssalmuk's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use MinerU or ssalmuk?
The choice depends on your requirements. MinerU (data, 54,130 stars) and ssalmuk (data, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, MinerU scores 80.4/100 and ssalmuk scores 64.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-10 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy