MinerU vs Void Cataloger — Trust Score Comparison

Name: MinerU vs Void Cataloger Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of MinerU and Void Cataloger. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

MinerU scores 80.4/100 (B) while Void Cataloger scores 58.8/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. MinerU leads by 21.6 points. MinerU is a data tool with 54,130 stars, Nerq Verified. Void Cataloger is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.

MinerU

80.4

B verified

Categorydata

Stars54,130

Sourcegithub

Security1

Compliance100

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Void Cataloger

58.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourceerc8004

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	MinerU	Void Cataloger
Trust Score	80.4/100	58.8/100
Grade	B	E
Stars	54,130	0
Category	data	uncategorized
Security	1	N/A
Compliance	100	N/A
Maintenance	1	N/A
Documentation	1	N/A
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	Yes	No

Verdict

MinerU leads with a trust score of 80.4/100 compared to Void Cataloger's 58.8/100 (a 21.6-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. MinerU scores 1 and Void Cataloger scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. MinerU: 1, Void Cataloger: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. MinerU: 1, Void Cataloger: N/A.

Community & Adoption

MinerU has 54,130 GitHub stars while Void Cataloger has 0. MinerU has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose MinerU if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (54,130 vs 0 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose Void Cataloger if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from MinerU to Void Cataloger (or vice versa)

When migrating between MinerU and Void Cataloger, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: MinerU (data) and Void Cataloger (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the MinerU safety report and Void Cataloger safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: MinerU has 54,130 stars and Void Cataloger has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

MinerU Safety Report Void Cataloger Safety Report MinerU Alternatives Void Cataloger Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MinerU or Void Cataloger?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, MinerU has a trust score of 80.4/100 (B) while Void Cataloger scores 58.8/100 (E). The 21.6-point difference suggests MinerU has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do MinerU and Void Cataloger compare on security?

MinerU has a security score of 1/100 and Void Cataloger scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. MinerU's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while Void Cataloger's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use MinerU or Void Cataloger?

The choice depends on your requirements. MinerU (data, 54,130 stars) and Void Cataloger (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, MinerU scores 80.4/100 and Void Cataloger scores 58.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.