inspector vs auth-js — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of inspector and auth-js. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

inspector scores 78.5/100 (B+) while auth-js scores 88.5/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. auth-js leads by 10.0 points. inspector is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. auth-js is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
78.5
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation50
vs
88.5
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric inspector auth-js
Trust Score78.5/10088.5/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance100100
Documentation5070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

auth-js leads with a trust score of 88.5/100 compared to inspector's 78.5/100 (a 10.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

inspector leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to auth-js's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

inspector demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 100/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

auth-js has better documentation (70/100 vs 50/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

inspector has 0 GitHub stars while auth-js has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose inspector if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose auth-js if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from inspector to auth-js (or vice versa)

When migrating between inspector and auth-js, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: inspector (uncategorized) and auth-js (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the inspector safety report and auth-js safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: inspector has 0 stars and auth-js has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
inspector Safety Report auth-js Safety Report inspector Alternatives auth-js Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, inspector or auth-js?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, inspector has a trust score of 78.5/100 (B+) while auth-js scores 88.5/100 (A). The 10.0-point difference suggests auth-js has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do inspector and auth-js compare on security?
inspector has a security score of 90/100 and auth-js scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. inspector's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while auth-js's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use inspector or auth-js?
The choice depends on your requirements. inspector (uncategorized, 0 stars) and auth-js (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, inspector scores 78.5/100 and auth-js scores 88.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (50 vs 70), and maintenance activity (100 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy