modula-ui vs checks — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of modula-ui and checks. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

modula-ui scores 55.0/100 (C) while checks scores 65.0/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. checks leads by 10.0 points. modula-ui is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. checks is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
55.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance54
Documentation65
vs
65.0
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance84
Documentation55

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric modula-ui checks
Trust Score55.0/10065.0/100
GradeCB-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5484
Documentation6555
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

checks leads with a trust score of 65.0/100 compared to modula-ui's 55.0/100 (a 10.0-point difference). checks scores higher on maintenance (84 vs 54). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

modula-ui leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to checks's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

checks demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (84/100 vs 54/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

modula-ui has better documentation (65/100 vs 55/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

modula-ui has 0 GitHub stars while checks has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose modula-ui if you need:

  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose checks if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from modula-ui to checks (or vice versa)

When migrating between modula-ui and checks, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: modula-ui (uncategorized) and checks (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the modula-ui safety report and checks safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: modula-ui has 0 stars and checks has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
modula-ui Safety Report checks Safety Report modula-ui Alternatives checks Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, modula-ui or checks?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, modula-ui has a trust score of 55.0/100 (C) while checks scores 65.0/100 (B-). The 10.0-point difference suggests checks has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do modula-ui and checks compare on security?
modula-ui has a security score of 90/100 and checks scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. modula-ui's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while checks's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use modula-ui or checks?
The choice depends on your requirements. modula-ui (uncategorized, 0 stars) and checks (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, modula-ui scores 55.0/100 and checks scores 65.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 55), and maintenance activity (54 vs 84).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy