n8n vs open-webui — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of n8n and open-webui. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

n8n scores 69.1/100 (C) while open-webui scores 60.4/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. n8n leads by 8.7 points. n8n is a infrastructure agent with 177,288 stars. open-webui is a infrastructure agent with 124,459 stars.
69.1
C
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars177,288
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
60.4
C
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars124,459
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric n8n open-webui
Trust Score69.1/10060.4/100
GradeCC
Stars177,288124,459
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security10
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

n8n leads with a trust score of 69.1/100 compared to open-webui's 60.4/100 (a 8.7-point difference). n8n scores higher on security (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

n8n leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to open-webui's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

n8n demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

n8n has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

n8n has 177,288 GitHub stars while open-webui has 124,459. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose n8n if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Larger community (177,288 vs 124,459 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose open-webui if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from n8n to open-webui (or vice versa)

When migrating between n8n and open-webui, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: n8n (infrastructure) and open-webui (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the n8n safety report and open-webui safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: n8n has 177,288 stars and open-webui has 124,459. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
n8n Safety Report open-webui Safety Report n8n Alternatives open-webui Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, n8n or open-webui?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, n8n has a trust score of 69.1/100 (C) while open-webui scores 60.4/100 (C). The 8.7-point difference suggests n8n has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do n8n and open-webui compare on security?
n8n has a security score of 1/100 and open-webui scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. n8n's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while open-webui's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use n8n or open-webui?
The choice depends on your requirements. n8n (infrastructure, 177,288 stars) and open-webui (infrastructure, 124,459 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, n8n scores 69.1/100 and open-webui scores 60.4/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-24 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy