ui vs raw-keyring — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of ui and raw-keyring. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ui scores 66.0/100 (B-) while raw-keyring scores 76.0/100 (B+) on the Nerq Trust Score. raw-keyring leads by 10.0 points. ui is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. raw-keyring is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
66.0
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance68
Documentation80
vs
76.0
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance78
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric ui raw-keyring
Trust Score66.0/10076.0/100
GradeB-B+
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance6878
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

raw-keyring leads with a trust score of 76.0/100 compared to ui's 66.0/100 (a 10.0-point difference). raw-keyring scores higher on maintenance (78 vs 68). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

ui leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to raw-keyring's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

raw-keyring demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (78/100 vs 68/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

ui has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

ui has 0 GitHub stars while raw-keyring has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ui if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose raw-keyring if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from ui to raw-keyring (or vice versa)

When migrating between ui and raw-keyring, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: ui (uncategorized) and raw-keyring (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ui safety report and raw-keyring safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: ui has 0 stars and raw-keyring has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
ui Safety Report raw-keyring Safety Report ui Alternatives raw-keyring Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ui or raw-keyring?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ui has a trust score of 66.0/100 (B-) while raw-keyring scores 76.0/100 (B+). The 10.0-point difference suggests raw-keyring has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do ui and raw-keyring compare on security?
ui has a security score of 90/100 and raw-keyring scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. ui's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while raw-keyring's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use ui or raw-keyring?
The choice depends on your requirements. ui (uncategorized, 0 stars) and raw-keyring (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, ui scores 66.0/100 and raw-keyring scores 76.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (68 vs 78).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy