php-parser vs container — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of php-parser and container. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

php-parser scores 61.2/100 (C+) while container scores 63.2/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. container leads by 2.0 points. php-parser is a uncategorized agent with 17,486 stars. container is a uncategorized agent with 10,054 stars.
61.2
C+
Categoryuncategorized
Stars17,486
Sourcepackagist
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation30
vs
63.2
C+
Categoryuncategorized
Stars10,054
Sourcepackagist
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric php-parser container
Trust Score61.2/10063.2/100
GradeC+C+
Stars17,48610,054
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5050
Documentation3040
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

container leads with a trust score of 63.2/100 compared to php-parser's 61.2/100 (a 2.0-point difference). However, php-parser has stronger community adoption (17,486 vs 10,054 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

php-parser leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to container's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

php-parser demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

container has better documentation (40/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

php-parser has 17,486 GitHub stars while container has 10,054. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose php-parser if you need:

  • Larger community (17,486 vs 10,054 stars)

Choose container if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from php-parser to container (or vice versa)

When migrating between php-parser and container, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: php-parser (uncategorized) and container (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the php-parser safety report and container safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: php-parser has 17,486 stars and container has 10,054. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
php-parser Safety Report container Safety Report php-parser Alternatives container Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, php-parser or container?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, php-parser has a trust score of 61.2/100 (C+) while container scores 63.2/100 (C+). The 2.0-point difference suggests container has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do php-parser and container compare on security?
php-parser has a security score of 90/100 and container scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. php-parser's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while container's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use php-parser or container?
The choice depends on your requirements. php-parser (uncategorized, 17,486 stars) and container (uncategorized, 10,054 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, php-parser scores 61.2/100 and container scores 63.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (30 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-28 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy