nojohns vs FpsTracker — Trust Score Comparison

Name: nojohns vs FpsTracker Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of nojohns and FpsTracker. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

nojohns scores 66.4/100 (C) while FpsTracker scores 57.0/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. nojohns leads by 9.4 points. nojohns is a gaming agent with 2 stars. FpsTracker is a gaming agent with 1 stars.

nojohns

66.4

Categorygaming

Stars2

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance100

Maintenance1

Documentation1

FpsTracker

57.0

Categorygaming

Stars1

Sourceerc8004

Maintenance0

Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	nojohns	FpsTracker
Trust Score	66.4/100	57.0/100
Grade	C	E
Stars	2	1
Category	gaming	gaming
Security	0	N/A
Compliance	100	N/A
Maintenance	1	0
Documentation	1	0
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

nojohns leads with a trust score of 66.4/100 compared to FpsTracker's 57.0/100 (a 9.4-point difference). nojohns scores higher on maintenance (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. nojohns scores 0 and FpsTracker scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

nojohns demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

nojohns has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

nojohns has 2 GitHub stars while FpsTracker has 1. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose nojohns if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (2 vs 1 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose FpsTracker if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from nojohns to FpsTracker (or vice versa)

When migrating between nojohns and FpsTracker, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: nojohns (gaming) and FpsTracker (gaming) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the nojohns safety report and FpsTracker safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: nojohns has 2 stars and FpsTracker has 1. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

nojohns Safety Report FpsTracker Safety Report nojohns Alternatives FpsTracker Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, nojohns or FpsTracker?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, nojohns has a trust score of 66.4/100 (C) while FpsTracker scores 57.0/100 (E). The 9.4-point difference suggests nojohns has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do nojohns and FpsTracker compare on security?

nojohns has a security score of 0/100 and FpsTracker scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. nojohns's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while FpsTracker's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use nojohns or FpsTracker?

The choice depends on your requirements. nojohns (gaming, 2 stars) and FpsTracker (gaming, 1 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, nojohns scores 66.4/100 and FpsTracker scores 57.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-23 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.