wasm vs shared — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of wasm and shared. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

wasm scores 72.8/100 (B) while shared scores 82.8/100 (A-) on the Nerq Trust Score. shared leads by 10.0 points. wasm is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. shared is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
72.8
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation80
vs
82.8
A- verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance90
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric wasm shared
Trust Score72.8/10082.8/100
GradeBA-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5090
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

shared leads with a trust score of 82.8/100 compared to wasm's 72.8/100 (a 10.0-point difference). shared scores higher on maintenance (90 vs 50). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

wasm leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to shared's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

shared demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (90/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

wasm has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

wasm has 0 GitHub stars while shared has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose wasm if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose shared if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from wasm to shared (or vice versa)

When migrating between wasm and shared, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: wasm (uncategorized) and shared (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the wasm safety report and shared safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: wasm has 0 stars and shared has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
wasm Safety Report shared Safety Report wasm Alternatives shared Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, wasm or shared?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, wasm has a trust score of 72.8/100 (B) while shared scores 82.8/100 (A-). The 10.0-point difference suggests shared has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do wasm and shared compare on security?
wasm has a security score of 90/100 and shared scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. wasm's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while shared's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use wasm or shared?
The choice depends on your requirements. wasm (uncategorized, 0 stars) and shared (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, wasm scores 72.8/100 and shared scores 82.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (50 vs 90).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy