org-mcp vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of org-mcp and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

org-mcp scores 62.8/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. org-mcp leads by 62.8 points. org-mcp is a infrastructure agent with 45 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars.
62.8
E
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars45
Sourcepulsemcp
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric org-mcp toolhive
Trust Score62.8/1000.0/100
GradeEA
Stars451,610
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
SecurityN/A1
ComplianceN/A85
Maintenance01
Documentation01
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

org-mcp leads with a trust score of 62.8/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 62.8-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 45 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. org-mcp scores N/A and toolhive scores 1 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

org-mcp has 45 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose org-mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 45 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from org-mcp to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between org-mcp and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: org-mcp (infrastructure) and toolhive (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the org-mcp safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: org-mcp has 45 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
org-mcp Safety Report toolhive Safety Report org-mcp Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, org-mcp or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, org-mcp has a trust score of 62.8/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 62.8-point difference suggests org-mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do org-mcp and toolhive compare on security?
org-mcp has a security score of N/A/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. org-mcp's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use org-mcp or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. org-mcp (infrastructure, 45 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, org-mcp scores 62.8/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (0 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy