client vs query-plan-executor — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of client and query-plan-executor. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

client scores 78.0/100 (B+) while query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. query-plan-executor leads by 9.5 points. client is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. query-plan-executor is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
78.0
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation70
vs
87.5
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric client query-plan-executor
Trust Score78.0/10087.5/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance100100
Documentation7080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

query-plan-executor leads with a trust score of 87.5/100 compared to client's 78.0/100 (a 9.5-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

client leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to query-plan-executor's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

client demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 100/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

query-plan-executor has better documentation (80/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

client has 0 GitHub stars while query-plan-executor has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose client if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose query-plan-executor if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from client to query-plan-executor (or vice versa)

When migrating between client and query-plan-executor, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: client (uncategorized) and query-plan-executor (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the client safety report and query-plan-executor safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: client has 0 stars and query-plan-executor has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
client Safety Report query-plan-executor Safety Report client Alternatives query-plan-executor Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, client or query-plan-executor?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, client has a trust score of 78.0/100 (B+) while query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100 (A). The 9.5-point difference suggests query-plan-executor has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do client and query-plan-executor compare on security?
client has a security score of 90/100 and query-plan-executor scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. client's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while query-plan-executor's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use client or query-plan-executor?
The choice depends on your requirements. client (uncategorized, 0 stars) and query-plan-executor (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, client scores 78.0/100 and query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (70 vs 80), and maintenance activity (100 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-07-31 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy