pcp vs screenpipe — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of pcp and screenpipe. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

pcp scores 62.9/100 (D) while screenpipe scores 0.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. pcp leads by 62.9 points. pcp is a personal productivity agent with 0 stars. screenpipe is a personal productivity agent with 16,943 stars.
62.9
D
Categorypersonal productivity
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
0.0
C
Categorypersonal productivity
Stars16,943
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance92
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric pcp screenpipe
Trust Score62.9/1000.0/100
GradeDC
Stars016,943
Categorypersonal productivitypersonal productivity
Security00
Compliance8792
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

pcp leads with a trust score of 62.9/100 compared to screenpipe's 0.0/100 (a 62.9-point difference). However, screenpipe has stronger community adoption (16,943 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

pcp leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to screenpipe's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

screenpipe demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

pcp has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

pcp has 0 GitHub stars while screenpipe has 16,943. screenpipe has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose pcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose screenpipe if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (16,943 vs 0 stars)

Switching from pcp to screenpipe (or vice versa)

When migrating between pcp and screenpipe, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: pcp (personal productivity) and screenpipe (personal productivity) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the pcp safety report and screenpipe safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: pcp has 0 stars and screenpipe has 16,943. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
pcp Safety Report screenpipe Safety Report pcp Alternatives screenpipe Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, pcp or screenpipe?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, pcp has a trust score of 62.9/100 (D) while screenpipe scores 0.0/100 (C). The 62.9-point difference suggests pcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do pcp and screenpipe compare on security?
pcp has a security score of 0/100 and screenpipe scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. pcp's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while screenpipe's is 92/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use pcp or screenpipe?
The choice depends on your requirements. pcp (personal productivity, 0 stars) and screenpipe (personal productivity, 16,943 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, pcp scores 62.9/100 and screenpipe scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-04 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy