pharia-common vs code-smore — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of pharia-common and code-smore. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

pharia-common scores 44.0/100 (F) while code-smore scores 53.0/100 (C-) on the Nerq Trust Score. code-smore leads by 9.0 points. pharia-common is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. code-smore is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
44.0
F
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
vs
53.0
C-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation30

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric pharia-common code-smore
Trust Score44.0/10053.0/100
GradeFC-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
SecurityN/A90
ComplianceN/AN/A
MaintenanceN/A50
DocumentationN/A30
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

code-smore leads with a trust score of 53.0/100 compared to pharia-common's 44.0/100 (a 9.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. pharia-common scores N/A and code-smore scores 90 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. pharia-common: N/A, code-smore: 50.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. pharia-common: N/A, code-smore: 30.

Community & Adoption

pharia-common has 0 GitHub stars while code-smore has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose pharia-common if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose code-smore if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from pharia-common to code-smore (or vice versa)

When migrating between pharia-common and code-smore, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: pharia-common (uncategorized) and code-smore (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the pharia-common safety report and code-smore safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: pharia-common has 0 stars and code-smore has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
pharia-common Safety Report code-smore Safety Report pharia-common Alternatives code-smore Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, pharia-common or code-smore?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, pharia-common has a trust score of 44.0/100 (F) while code-smore scores 53.0/100 (C-). The 9.0-point difference suggests code-smore has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do pharia-common and code-smore compare on security?
pharia-common has a security score of N/A/100 and code-smore scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. pharia-common's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while code-smore's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use pharia-common or code-smore?
The choice depends on your requirements. pharia-common (uncategorized, 0 stars) and code-smore (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, pharia-common scores 44.0/100 and code-smore scores 53.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 30), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-22 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy