Polydev vs agent-scan — Trust Score Comparison

Name: Polydev vs agent-scan Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of Polydev and agent-scan. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Polydev scores 57.8/100 (E) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. Polydev leads by 57.8 points. Polydev is a infrastructure agent with 0 stars. agent-scan is a infrastructure agent with 1,981 stars.

Polydev

57.8

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars0

Sourcepulsemcp

Maintenance0

Documentation0

agent-scan

0.0

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars1,981

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance97

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	Polydev	agent-scan
Trust Score	57.8/100	0.0/100
Grade	E	A
Stars	0	1,981
Category	infrastructure	infrastructure
Security	N/A	0
Compliance	N/A	97
Maintenance	0	1
Documentation	0	1
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

Polydev leads with a trust score of 57.8/100 compared to agent-scan's 0.0/100 (a 57.8-point difference). However, agent-scan has stronger community adoption (1,981 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. Polydev scores N/A and agent-scan scores 0 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

agent-scan demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agent-scan has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Polydev has 0 GitHub stars while agent-scan has 1,981. agent-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Polydev if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose agent-scan if you need:

More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (1,981 vs 0 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from Polydev to agent-scan (or vice versa)

When migrating between Polydev and agent-scan, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: Polydev (infrastructure) and agent-scan (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Polydev safety report and agent-scan safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: Polydev has 0 stars and agent-scan has 1,981. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

Polydev Safety Report agent-scan Safety Report Polydev Alternatives agent-scan Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Polydev or agent-scan?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Polydev has a trust score of 57.8/100 (E) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A). The 57.8-point difference suggests Polydev has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do Polydev and agent-scan compare on security?

Polydev has a security score of N/A/100 and agent-scan scores 0/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. Polydev's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while agent-scan's is 97/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use Polydev or agent-scan?

The choice depends on your requirements. Polydev (infrastructure, 0 stars) and agent-scan (infrastructure, 1,981 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Polydev scores 57.8/100 and agent-scan scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (0 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-02 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.