Psiphon vs PIA — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of Psiphon and PIA. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Psiphon scores 65.0/100 (B-) while PIA scores 75.0/100 (B+) on the Nerq Trust Score. PIA leads by 10.0 points. Psiphon is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. PIA is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
65.0
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70
vs
75.0
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcevpn
Security80
Maintenance75
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric Psiphon PIA
Trust Score65.0/10075.0/100
GradeB-B+
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security8080
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance7575
Documentation7070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

PIA leads with a trust score of 75.0/100 compared to Psiphon's 65.0/100 (a 10.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Psiphon leads on security with a score of 80/100 compared to PIA's 80/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

Psiphon demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (75/100 vs 75/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

Psiphon has better documentation (70/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Psiphon has 0 GitHub stars while PIA has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Psiphon if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose PIA if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from Psiphon to PIA (or vice versa)

When migrating between Psiphon and PIA, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: Psiphon (uncategorized) and PIA (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Psiphon safety report and PIA safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: Psiphon has 0 stars and PIA has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Psiphon Safety Report PIA Safety Report Psiphon Alternatives PIA Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Psiphon or PIA?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Psiphon has a trust score of 65.0/100 (B-) while PIA scores 75.0/100 (B+). The 10.0-point difference suggests PIA has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do Psiphon and PIA compare on security?
Psiphon has a security score of 80/100 and PIA scores 80/100. Both have comparable security profiles. Psiphon's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while PIA's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use Psiphon or PIA?
The choice depends on your requirements. Psiphon (uncategorized, 0 stars) and PIA (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Psiphon scores 65.0/100 and PIA scores 75.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (70 vs 70), and maintenance activity (75 vs 75).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-23 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy