qwen-code vs SuperAGI — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of qwen-code and SuperAGI. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

qwen-code scores 76.1/100 (B) while SuperAGI scores 59.4/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. qwen-code leads by 16.7 points. qwen-code is a devops agent with 21,095 stars, Nerq Verified. SuperAGI is a devops agent with 17,187 stars.
76.1
B verified
Categorydevops
Stars21,095
Sourcegithub
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
59.4
D
Categorydevops
Stars17,187
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric qwen-code SuperAGI
Trust Score76.1/10059.4/100
GradeBD
Stars21,09517,187
Categorydevopsdevops
SecurityN/A0
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

qwen-code leads with a trust score of 76.1/100 compared to SuperAGI's 59.4/100 (a 16.7-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. qwen-code scores N/A and SuperAGI scores 0 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

qwen-code demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

qwen-code has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

qwen-code has 21,095 GitHub stars while SuperAGI has 17,187. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose qwen-code if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Larger community (21,095 vs 17,187 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose SuperAGI if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from qwen-code to SuperAGI (or vice versa)

When migrating between qwen-code and SuperAGI, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: qwen-code (devops) and SuperAGI (devops) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the qwen-code safety report and SuperAGI safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: qwen-code has 21,095 stars and SuperAGI has 17,187. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
qwen-code Safety Report SuperAGI Safety Report qwen-code Alternatives SuperAGI Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, qwen-code or SuperAGI?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, qwen-code has a trust score of 76.1/100 (B) while SuperAGI scores 59.4/100 (D). The 16.7-point difference suggests qwen-code has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do qwen-code and SuperAGI compare on security?
qwen-code has a security score of N/A/100 and SuperAGI scores 0/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. qwen-code's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while SuperAGI's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use qwen-code or SuperAGI?
The choice depends on your requirements. qwen-code (devops, 21,095 stars) and SuperAGI (devops, 17,187 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, qwen-code scores 76.1/100 and SuperAGI scores 59.4/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy