ReftrixMCP by TKMD vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of ReftrixMCP by TKMD and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ReftrixMCP by TKMD scores 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. ReftrixMCP by TKMD leads by 63.5 points. ReftrixMCP by TKMD is a uncategorized tool with 1 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure tool with 1,610 stars.
63.5
E
Categoryuncategorized
Stars1
Sourcepulsemcp
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric ReftrixMCP by TKMD toolhive
Trust Score63.5/1000.0/100
GradeEA
Stars11,610
Categoryuncategorizedinfrastructure
SecurityN/A1
ComplianceN/A85
MaintenanceN/A1
DocumentationN/A1
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

ReftrixMCP by TKMD leads with a trust score of 63.5/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 63.5-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 1 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. ReftrixMCP by TKMD scores N/A and toolhive scores 1 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. ReftrixMCP by TKMD: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. ReftrixMCP by TKMD: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Community & Adoption

ReftrixMCP by TKMD has 1 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ReftrixMCP by TKMD if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 1 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from ReftrixMCP by TKMD to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between ReftrixMCP by TKMD and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: ReftrixMCP by TKMD (uncategorized) and toolhive (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ReftrixMCP by TKMD safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: ReftrixMCP by TKMD has 1 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
ReftrixMCP by TKMD Safety Report toolhive Safety Report ReftrixMCP by TKMD Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ReftrixMCP by TKMD or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ReftrixMCP by TKMD has a trust score of 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 63.5-point difference suggests ReftrixMCP by TKMD has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do ReftrixMCP by TKMD and toolhive compare on security?
ReftrixMCP by TKMD has a security score of N/A/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. ReftrixMCP by TKMD's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use ReftrixMCP by TKMD or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. ReftrixMCP by TKMD (uncategorized, 1 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, ReftrixMCP by TKMD scores 63.5/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 1), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy