require-main-filename vs minimatch — Trust Score Comparison

Name: require-main-filename vs minimatch Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of require-main-filename and minimatch. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

require-main-filename scores 63.8/100 (C+) while minimatch scores 75.5/100 (B+) on the Nerq Trust Score. minimatch leads by 11.7 points. require-main-filename is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. minimatch is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.

require-main-filename

63.8

C+

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm

Security90

Maintenance35

Documentation65

minimatch

75.5

B+ verified

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm

Security90

Maintenance90

Documentation55

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	require-main-filename	minimatch
Trust Score	63.8/100	75.5/100
Grade	C+	B+
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	90
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	35	90
Documentation	65	55
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	Yes

Verdict

minimatch leads with a trust score of 75.5/100 compared to require-main-filename's 63.8/100 (a 11.7-point difference). minimatch scores higher on maintenance (90 vs 35). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

require-main-filename leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to minimatch's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

minimatch demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (90/100 vs 35/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

require-main-filename has better documentation (65/100 vs 55/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

require-main-filename has 0 GitHub stars while minimatch has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose require-main-filename if you need:

Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose minimatch if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from require-main-filename to minimatch (or vice versa)

When migrating between require-main-filename and minimatch, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: require-main-filename (uncategorized) and minimatch (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the require-main-filename safety report and minimatch safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: require-main-filename has 0 stars and minimatch has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

require-main-filename Safety Report minimatch Safety Report require-main-filename Alternatives minimatch Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, require-main-filename or minimatch?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, require-main-filename has a trust score of 63.8/100 (C+) while minimatch scores 75.5/100 (B+). The 11.7-point difference suggests minimatch has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do require-main-filename and minimatch compare on security?

require-main-filename has a security score of 90/100 and minimatch scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. require-main-filename's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while minimatch's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use require-main-filename or minimatch?

The choice depends on your requirements. require-main-filename (uncategorized, 0 stars) and minimatch (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, require-main-filename scores 63.8/100 and minimatch scores 75.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 55), and maintenance activity (35 vs 90).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-12 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.