pluginutils vs auth-js — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of pluginutils and auth-js. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

pluginutils scores 78.8/100 (B+) while auth-js scores 88.5/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. auth-js leads by 9.7 points. pluginutils is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. auth-js is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
78.8
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance65
Documentation80
vs
88.5
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric pluginutils auth-js
Trust Score78.8/10088.5/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance65100
Documentation8070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

auth-js leads with a trust score of 88.5/100 compared to pluginutils's 78.8/100 (a 9.7-point difference). auth-js scores higher on maintenance (100 vs 65). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

pluginutils leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to auth-js's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

auth-js demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 65/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

pluginutils has better documentation (80/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

pluginutils has 0 GitHub stars while auth-js has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose pluginutils if you need:

  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose auth-js if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from pluginutils to auth-js (or vice versa)

When migrating between pluginutils and auth-js, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: pluginutils (uncategorized) and auth-js (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the pluginutils safety report and auth-js safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: pluginutils has 0 stars and auth-js has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
pluginutils Safety Report auth-js Safety Report pluginutils Alternatives auth-js Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, pluginutils or auth-js?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, pluginutils has a trust score of 78.8/100 (B+) while auth-js scores 88.5/100 (A). The 9.7-point difference suggests auth-js has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do pluginutils and auth-js compare on security?
pluginutils has a security score of 90/100 and auth-js scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. pluginutils's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while auth-js's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use pluginutils or auth-js?
The choice depends on your requirements. pluginutils (uncategorized, 0 stars) and auth-js (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, pluginutils scores 78.8/100 and auth-js scores 88.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 70), and maintenance activity (65 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-22 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy