screeninfo vs atty — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of screeninfo and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

screeninfo scores 71.8/100 (B) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. screeninfo leads by 16.0 points. screeninfo is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. atty is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
71.8
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcepypi
Security90
Maintenance70
Documentation65
vs
55.8
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security60
Maintenance50
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric screeninfo atty
Trust Score71.8/10055.8/100
GradeBC
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9060
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance7050
Documentation6540
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

screeninfo leads with a trust score of 71.8/100 compared to atty's 55.8/100 (a 16.0-point difference). screeninfo scores higher on security (90 vs 60), maintenance (70 vs 50). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

screeninfo leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to atty's 60/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

screeninfo demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (70/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

screeninfo has better documentation (65/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

screeninfo has 0 GitHub stars while atty has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose screeninfo if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose atty if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from screeninfo to atty (or vice versa)

When migrating between screeninfo and atty, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: screeninfo (uncategorized) and atty (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the screeninfo safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: screeninfo has 0 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
screeninfo Safety Report atty Safety Report screeninfo Alternatives atty Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, screeninfo or atty?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, screeninfo has a trust score of 71.8/100 (B) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C). The 16.0-point difference suggests screeninfo has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do screeninfo and atty compare on security?
screeninfo has a security score of 90/100 and atty scores 60/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. screeninfo's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while atty's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use screeninfo or atty?
The choice depends on your requirements. screeninfo (uncategorized, 0 stars) and atty (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, screeninfo scores 71.8/100 and atty scores 55.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 40), and maintenance activity (70 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy