sd-agent vs zabbix-agent — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of sd-agent and zabbix-agent. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

sd-agent scores 59.6/100 (D) while zabbix-agent scores 63.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. zabbix-agent leads by 4.2 points. sd-agent is a monitoring agent with 1 stars. zabbix-agent is a monitoring agent with 237 stars.
59.6
D
Categorymonitoring
Stars1
Sourcedocker_hub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance0
Documentation0
vs
63.8
C
Categorymonitoring
Stars237
Sourcedocker_hub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric sd-agent zabbix-agent
Trust Score59.6/10063.8/100
GradeDC
Stars1237
Categorymonitoringmonitoring
Security00
Compliance100100
Maintenance00
Documentation00
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

zabbix-agent leads with a trust score of 63.8/100 compared to sd-agent's 59.6/100 (a 4.2-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

sd-agent leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to zabbix-agent's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

sd-agent demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (0/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

sd-agent has better documentation (0/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

sd-agent has 1 GitHub stars while zabbix-agent has 237. zabbix-agent has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose sd-agent if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose zabbix-agent if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Larger community (237 vs 1 stars)

Switching from sd-agent to zabbix-agent (or vice versa)

When migrating between sd-agent and zabbix-agent, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: sd-agent (monitoring) and zabbix-agent (monitoring) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the sd-agent safety report and zabbix-agent safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: sd-agent has 1 stars and zabbix-agent has 237. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
sd-agent Safety Report zabbix-agent Safety Report sd-agent Alternatives zabbix-agent Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, sd-agent or zabbix-agent?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, sd-agent has a trust score of 59.6/100 (D) while zabbix-agent scores 63.8/100 (C). The 4.2-point difference suggests zabbix-agent has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do sd-agent and zabbix-agent compare on security?
sd-agent has a security score of 0/100 and zabbix-agent scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. sd-agent's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while zabbix-agent's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use sd-agent or zabbix-agent?
The choice depends on your requirements. sd-agent (monitoring, 1 stars) and zabbix-agent (monitoring, 237 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, sd-agent scores 59.6/100 and zabbix-agent scores 63.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 0), and maintenance activity (0 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-19 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy