sentryshot_filter vs atty — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of sentryshot_filter and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

sentryshot_filter scores 46.2/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. atty leads by 9.6 points. sentryshot_filter is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. atty is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
46.2
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation30
vs
55.8
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security60
Maintenance50
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric sentryshot_filter atty
Trust Score46.2/10055.8/100
GradeDC
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9060
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5050
Documentation3040
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

atty leads with a trust score of 55.8/100 compared to sentryshot_filter's 46.2/100 (a 9.6-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

sentryshot_filter leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to atty's 60/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

sentryshot_filter demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

atty has better documentation (40/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

sentryshot_filter has 0 GitHub stars while atty has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose sentryshot_filter if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities

Choose atty if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from sentryshot_filter to atty (or vice versa)

When migrating between sentryshot_filter and atty, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: sentryshot_filter (uncategorized) and atty (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the sentryshot_filter safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: sentryshot_filter has 0 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
sentryshot_filter Safety Report atty Safety Report sentryshot_filter Alternatives atty Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, sentryshot_filter or atty?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, sentryshot_filter has a trust score of 46.2/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C). The 9.6-point difference suggests atty has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do sentryshot_filter and atty compare on security?
sentryshot_filter has a security score of 90/100 and atty scores 60/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. sentryshot_filter's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while atty's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use sentryshot_filter or atty?
The choice depends on your requirements. sentryshot_filter (uncategorized, 0 stars) and atty (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, sentryshot_filter scores 46.2/100 and atty scores 55.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (30 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-19 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy