shadowsocks-libev vs LightAgent — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of shadowsocks-libev and LightAgent. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | shadowsocks-libev | LightAgent |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 60.1/100 | 85.2/100 |
| Grade | C | A |
| Stars | 507 | 583 |
| Category | uncategorized | infrastructure |
| Security | 0 | 1 |
| Compliance | 100 | 92 |
| Maintenance | 0 | 1 |
| Documentation | 0 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | N/A |
| Verified | No | Yes |
Verdict
LightAgent leads with a trust score of 85.2/100 compared to shadowsocks-libev's 60.1/100 (a 25.1-point difference). LightAgent scores higher on security (1 vs 0), maintenance (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
LightAgent leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to shadowsocks-libev's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
LightAgent demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
LightAgent has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
shadowsocks-libev has 507 GitHub stars while LightAgent has 583. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose shadowsocks-libev if you need:
- Consider if it better fits your specific use case
Choose LightAgent if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Larger community (583 vs 507 stars)
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from shadowsocks-libev to LightAgent (or vice versa)
When migrating between shadowsocks-libev and LightAgent, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: shadowsocks-libev (uncategorized) and LightAgent (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the shadowsocks-libev safety report and LightAgent safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: shadowsocks-libev has 507 stars and LightAgent has 583. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-04-10 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.