shai vs create-sss — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of shai and create-sss. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

shai scores 69.1/100 (C) while create-sss scores 56.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. shai leads by 13.1 points. shai is a coding tool with 40 stars. create-sss is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.
69.1
C
Categorycoding
Stars40
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
56.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance58
Documentation65

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric shai create-sss
Trust Score69.1/10056.0/100
GradeCC
Stars400
Categorycodinguncategorized
Security090
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance158
Documentation165
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

shai leads with a trust score of 69.1/100 compared to create-sss's 56.0/100 (a 13.1-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

create-sss leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to shai's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

create-sss demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (58/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

create-sss has better documentation (65/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

shai has 40 GitHub stars while create-sss has 0. shai has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose shai if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Larger community (40 vs 0 stars)

Choose create-sss if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from shai to create-sss (or vice versa)

When migrating between shai and create-sss, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: shai (coding) and create-sss (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the shai safety report and create-sss safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: shai has 40 stars and create-sss has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
shai Safety Report create-sss Safety Report shai Alternatives create-sss Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, shai or create-sss?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, shai has a trust score of 69.1/100 (C) while create-sss scores 56.0/100 (C). The 13.1-point difference suggests shai has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do shai and create-sss compare on security?
shai has a security score of 0/100 and create-sss scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. shai's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while create-sss's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use shai or create-sss?
The choice depends on your requirements. shai (coding, 40 stars) and create-sss (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, shai scores 69.1/100 and create-sss scores 56.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 65), and maintenance activity (1 vs 58).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-28 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy