shap vs atty — Trust Score Comparison

Name: shap vs atty Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of shap and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

shap scores 52.5/100 (C-) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. atty leads by 3.3 points. shap is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. atty is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

shap

52.5

C-

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourceerc8004

atty

55.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcecrates

Security60

Maintenance50

Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	shap	atty
Trust Score	52.5/100	55.8/100
Grade	C-	C
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	N/A	60
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	N/A	50
Documentation	N/A	40
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

atty leads with a trust score of 55.8/100 compared to shap's 52.5/100 (a 3.3-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. shap scores N/A and atty scores 60 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. shap: N/A, atty: 50.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. shap: N/A, atty: 40.

Community & Adoption

shap has 0 GitHub stars while atty has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose shap if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose atty if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from shap to atty (or vice versa)

When migrating between shap and atty, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: shap (uncategorized) and atty (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the shap safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: shap has 0 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

shap Safety Report atty Safety Report shap Alternatives atty Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, shap or atty?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, shap has a trust score of 52.5/100 (C-) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C). The 3.3-point difference suggests atty has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do shap and atty compare on security?

shap has a security score of N/A/100 and atty scores 60/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. shap's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while atty's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use shap or atty?

The choice depends on your requirements. shap (uncategorized, 0 stars) and atty (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, shap scores 52.5/100 and atty scores 55.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 40), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-27 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.