skill-tree vs client — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of skill-tree and client. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

skill-tree scores 58.8/100 (C) while client scores 68.5/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. client leads by 9.7 points. skill-tree is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. client is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
58.8
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance57
Documentation80
vs
68.5
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance78
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric skill-tree client
Trust Score58.8/10068.5/100
GradeCB-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5778
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

client leads with a trust score of 68.5/100 compared to skill-tree's 58.8/100 (a 9.7-point difference). client scores higher on maintenance (78 vs 57). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

skill-tree leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to client's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

client demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (78/100 vs 57/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

skill-tree has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

skill-tree has 0 GitHub stars while client has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose skill-tree if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose client if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from skill-tree to client (or vice versa)

When migrating between skill-tree and client, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: skill-tree (uncategorized) and client (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the skill-tree safety report and client safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: skill-tree has 0 stars and client has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
skill-tree Safety Report client Safety Report skill-tree Alternatives client Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, skill-tree or client?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, skill-tree has a trust score of 58.8/100 (C) while client scores 68.5/100 (B-). The 9.7-point difference suggests client has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do skill-tree and client compare on security?
skill-tree has a security score of 90/100 and client scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. skill-tree's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while client's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use skill-tree or client?
The choice depends on your requirements. skill-tree (uncategorized, 0 stars) and client (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, skill-tree scores 58.8/100 and client scores 68.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (57 vs 78).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy