slide vs email-extractor — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of slide and email-extractor. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

slide scores 0.0/100 (D) while email-extractor scores 55.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. email-extractor leads by 55.0 points. slide is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. email-extractor is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
0.0
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100
vs
55.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric slide email-extractor
Trust Score0.0/10055.0/100
GradeDC
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
SecurityN/A90
Compliance100N/A
MaintenanceN/A50
DocumentationN/A40
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

email-extractor leads with a trust score of 55.0/100 compared to slide's 0.0/100 (a 55.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. slide scores N/A and email-extractor scores 90 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. slide: N/A, email-extractor: 50.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. slide: N/A, email-extractor: 40.

Community & Adoption

slide has 0 GitHub stars while email-extractor has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose slide if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose email-extractor if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from slide to email-extractor (or vice versa)

When migrating between slide and email-extractor, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: slide (uncategorized) and email-extractor (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the slide safety report and email-extractor safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: slide has 0 stars and email-extractor has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
slide Safety Report email-extractor Safety Report slide Alternatives email-extractor Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, slide or email-extractor?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, slide has a trust score of 0.0/100 (D) while email-extractor scores 55.0/100 (C). The 55.0-point difference suggests email-extractor has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do slide and email-extractor compare on security?
slide has a security score of N/A/100 and email-extractor scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. slide's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while email-extractor's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use slide or email-extractor?
The choice depends on your requirements. slide (uncategorized, 0 stars) and email-extractor (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, slide scores 0.0/100 and email-extractor scores 55.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 40), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-12 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy