agent-scan vs supascribe-notes-mcp — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of agent-scan and supascribe-notes-mcp. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A) while supascribe-notes-mcp scores 61.7/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. supascribe-notes-mcp leads by 61.7 points. agent-scan is a infrastructure agent with 1,981 stars. supascribe-notes-mcp is a infrastructure agent with 0 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,981
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance97
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
61.7
D
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric agent-scan supascribe-notes-mcp
Trust Score0.0/10061.7/100
GradeAD
Stars1,9810
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security00
Compliance97100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

supascribe-notes-mcp leads with a trust score of 61.7/100 compared to agent-scan's 0.0/100 (a 61.7-point difference). supascribe-notes-mcp scores higher on compliance (100 vs 97). However, agent-scan has stronger community adoption (1,981 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

agent-scan leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to supascribe-notes-mcp's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

agent-scan demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agent-scan has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

agent-scan has 1,981 GitHub stars while supascribe-notes-mcp has 0. agent-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agent-scan if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,981 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose supascribe-notes-mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from agent-scan to supascribe-notes-mcp (or vice versa)

When migrating between agent-scan and supascribe-notes-mcp, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: agent-scan (infrastructure) and supascribe-notes-mcp (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agent-scan safety report and supascribe-notes-mcp safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: agent-scan has 1,981 stars and supascribe-notes-mcp has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
agent-scan Safety Report supascribe-notes-mcp Safety Report agent-scan Alternatives supascribe-notes-mcp Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agent-scan or supascribe-notes-mcp?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agent-scan has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while supascribe-notes-mcp scores 61.7/100 (D). The 61.7-point difference suggests supascribe-notes-mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do agent-scan and supascribe-notes-mcp compare on security?
agent-scan has a security score of 0/100 and supascribe-notes-mcp scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. agent-scan's compliance score is 97/100 (EU risk: N/A), while supascribe-notes-mcp's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use agent-scan or supascribe-notes-mcp?
The choice depends on your requirements. agent-scan (infrastructure, 1,981 stars) and supascribe-notes-mcp (infrastructure, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, agent-scan scores 0.0/100 and supascribe-notes-mcp scores 61.7/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-19 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy