sql-guard vs js-runner — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of sql-guard and js-runner. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

sql-guard scores 62.2/100 (C+) while js-runner scores 72.2/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. js-runner leads by 10.0 points. sql-guard is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. js-runner is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
62.2
C+
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance53
Documentation80
vs
72.2
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance81
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric sql-guard js-runner
Trust Score62.2/10072.2/100
GradeC+B
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5381
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

js-runner leads with a trust score of 72.2/100 compared to sql-guard's 62.2/100 (a 10.0-point difference). js-runner scores higher on maintenance (81 vs 53). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

sql-guard leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to js-runner's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

js-runner demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (81/100 vs 53/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

sql-guard has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

sql-guard has 0 GitHub stars while js-runner has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose sql-guard if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose js-runner if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from sql-guard to js-runner (or vice versa)

When migrating between sql-guard and js-runner, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: sql-guard (uncategorized) and js-runner (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the sql-guard safety report and js-runner safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: sql-guard has 0 stars and js-runner has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
sql-guard Safety Report js-runner Safety Report sql-guard Alternatives js-runner Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, sql-guard or js-runner?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, sql-guard has a trust score of 62.2/100 (C+) while js-runner scores 72.2/100 (B). The 10.0-point difference suggests js-runner has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do sql-guard and js-runner compare on security?
sql-guard has a security score of 90/100 and js-runner scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. sql-guard's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while js-runner's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use sql-guard or js-runner?
The choice depends on your requirements. sql-guard (uncategorized, 0 stars) and js-runner (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, sql-guard scores 62.2/100 and js-runner scores 72.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (53 vs 81).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-02 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy