sqlite-mcp vs Agent Trust Gateway — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of sqlite-mcp and Agent Trust Gateway. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

sqlite-mcp scores 74.8/100 (B) while Agent Trust Gateway scores 37.9/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. sqlite-mcp leads by 36.9 points. sqlite-mcp is a infrastructure tool with 3 stars, Nerq Verified. Agent Trust Gateway is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars.
74.8
B verified
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars3
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
37.9
E
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourceerc8004

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric sqlite-mcp Agent Trust Gateway
Trust Score74.8/10037.9/100
GradeBE
Stars30
Categoryinfrastructureuncategorized
Security0N/A
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation1N/A
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

sqlite-mcp leads with a trust score of 74.8/100 compared to Agent Trust Gateway's 37.9/100 (a 36.9-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. sqlite-mcp scores 0 and Agent Trust Gateway scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. sqlite-mcp: 1, Agent Trust Gateway: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. sqlite-mcp: 1, Agent Trust Gateway: N/A.

Community & Adoption

sqlite-mcp has 3 GitHub stars while Agent Trust Gateway has 0. sqlite-mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose sqlite-mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (3 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose Agent Trust Gateway if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from sqlite-mcp to Agent Trust Gateway (or vice versa)

When migrating between sqlite-mcp and Agent Trust Gateway, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: sqlite-mcp (infrastructure) and Agent Trust Gateway (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the sqlite-mcp safety report and Agent Trust Gateway safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: sqlite-mcp has 3 stars and Agent Trust Gateway has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
sqlite-mcp Safety Report Agent Trust Gateway Safety Report sqlite-mcp Alternatives Agent Trust Gateway Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, sqlite-mcp or Agent Trust Gateway?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, sqlite-mcp has a trust score of 74.8/100 (B) while Agent Trust Gateway scores 37.9/100 (E). The 36.9-point difference suggests sqlite-mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do sqlite-mcp and Agent Trust Gateway compare on security?
sqlite-mcp has a security score of 0/100 and Agent Trust Gateway scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. sqlite-mcp's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while Agent Trust Gateway's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use sqlite-mcp or Agent Trust Gateway?
The choice depends on your requirements. sqlite-mcp (infrastructure, 3 stars) and Agent Trust Gateway (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, sqlite-mcp scores 74.8/100 and Agent Trust Gateway scores 37.9/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-04-11 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy