Squares vs Unturned — Trust Score Comparison

Name: Squares vs Unturned Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of Squares and Unturned. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Squares scores 59.0/100 (C) while Unturned scores 64.0/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. Unturned leads by 5.0 points. Squares is a uncategorized agent with 100 stars. Unturned is a uncategorized agent with 91 stars.

Squares

59.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars100

Sourcesteam

Security70

Maintenance60

Documentation50

Unturned

64.0

C+

Categoryuncategorized

Stars91

Sourcesteam

Security70

Maintenance60

Documentation50

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	Squares	Unturned
Trust Score	59.0/100	64.0/100
Grade	C	C+
Stars	100	91
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	70	70
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	60	60
Documentation	50	50
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

Unturned leads with a trust score of 64.0/100 compared to Squares's 59.0/100 (a 5.0-point difference). However, Squares has stronger community adoption (100 vs 91 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Squares leads on security with a score of 70/100 compared to Unturned's 70/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

Squares demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (60/100 vs 60/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

Squares has better documentation (50/100 vs 50/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Squares has 100 GitHub stars while Unturned has 91. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Squares if you need:

Larger community (100 vs 91 stars)

Choose Unturned if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from Squares to Unturned (or vice versa)

When migrating between Squares and Unturned, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: Squares (uncategorized) and Unturned (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Squares safety report and Unturned safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: Squares has 100 stars and Unturned has 91. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

Squares Safety Report Unturned Safety Report Squares Alternatives Unturned Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Squares or Unturned?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Squares has a trust score of 59.0/100 (C) while Unturned scores 64.0/100 (C+). The 5.0-point difference suggests Unturned has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do Squares and Unturned compare on security?

Squares has a security score of 70/100 and Unturned scores 70/100. Both have comparable security profiles. Squares's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Unturned's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use Squares or Unturned?

The choice depends on your requirements. Squares (uncategorized, 100 stars) and Unturned (uncategorized, 91 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Squares scores 59.0/100 and Unturned scores 64.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (50 vs 50), and maintenance activity (60 vs 60).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-08 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.