ssh-mcp vs js-runner — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of ssh-mcp and js-runner. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | ssh-mcp | js-runner |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 0.0/100 | 72.2/100 |
| Grade | C | B |
| Stars | 269 | 0 |
| Category | infrastructure | uncategorized |
| Security | 0 | 90 |
| Compliance | 100 | N/A |
| Maintenance | 0 | 81 |
| Documentation | 0 | 80 |
| EU AI Act Risk | minimal | N/A |
| Verified | No | Yes |
Verdict
js-runner leads with a trust score of 72.2/100 compared to ssh-mcp's 0.0/100 (a 72.2-point difference). js-runner scores higher on security (90 vs 0), maintenance (81 vs 0). However, ssh-mcp has stronger community adoption (269 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
js-runner leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to ssh-mcp's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
js-runner demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (81/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
js-runner has better documentation (80/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
ssh-mcp has 269 GitHub stars while js-runner has 0. ssh-mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose ssh-mcp if you need:
- Larger community (269 vs 0 stars)
Choose js-runner if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from ssh-mcp to js-runner (or vice versa)
When migrating between ssh-mcp and js-runner, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: ssh-mcp (infrastructure) and js-runner (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ssh-mcp safety report and js-runner safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: ssh-mcp has 269 stars and js-runner has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-11-04 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.