ssh-mcp vs vite-bundle-visualizer — Trust Score Comparison

Name: ssh-mcp vs vite-bundle-visualizer Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of ssh-mcp and vite-bundle-visualizer. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ssh-mcp scores 0.0/100 (C) while vite-bundle-visualizer scores 72.2/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. vite-bundle-visualizer leads by 72.2 points. ssh-mcp is a infrastructure tool with 269 stars. vite-bundle-visualizer is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.

ssh-mcp

0.0

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars269

Sourcemcp

Security0

Compliance100

Maintenance0

Documentation0

vite-bundle-visualizer

72.2

B verified

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm

Security90

Maintenance74

Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	ssh-mcp	vite-bundle-visualizer
Trust Score	0.0/100	72.2/100
Grade	C	B
Stars	269	0
Category	infrastructure	uncategorized
Security	0	90
Compliance	100	N/A
Maintenance	0	74
Documentation	0	70
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	No	Yes

Verdict

vite-bundle-visualizer leads with a trust score of 72.2/100 compared to ssh-mcp's 0.0/100 (a 72.2-point difference). vite-bundle-visualizer scores higher on security (90 vs 0), maintenance (74 vs 0). However, ssh-mcp has stronger community adoption (269 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

vite-bundle-visualizer leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to ssh-mcp's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

vite-bundle-visualizer demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (74/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

vite-bundle-visualizer has better documentation (70/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

ssh-mcp has 269 GitHub stars while vite-bundle-visualizer has 0. ssh-mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ssh-mcp if you need:

Larger community (269 vs 0 stars)

Choose vite-bundle-visualizer if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from ssh-mcp to vite-bundle-visualizer (or vice versa)

When migrating between ssh-mcp and vite-bundle-visualizer, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: ssh-mcp (infrastructure) and vite-bundle-visualizer (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ssh-mcp safety report and vite-bundle-visualizer safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: ssh-mcp has 269 stars and vite-bundle-visualizer has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

ssh-mcp Safety Report vite-bundle-visualizer Safety Report ssh-mcp Alternatives vite-bundle-visualizer Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ssh-mcp or vite-bundle-visualizer?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ssh-mcp has a trust score of 0.0/100 (C) while vite-bundle-visualizer scores 72.2/100 (B). The 72.2-point difference suggests vite-bundle-visualizer has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do ssh-mcp and vite-bundle-visualizer compare on security?

ssh-mcp has a security score of 0/100 and vite-bundle-visualizer scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. ssh-mcp's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while vite-bundle-visualizer's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use ssh-mcp or vite-bundle-visualizer?

The choice depends on your requirements. ssh-mcp (infrastructure, 269 stars) and vite-bundle-visualizer (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, ssh-mcp scores 0.0/100 and vite-bundle-visualizer scores 72.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 70), and maintenance activity (0 vs 74).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.