ssh-config vs lrtable — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of ssh-config and lrtable. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ssh-config scores 79.8/100 (B+) while lrtable scores 57.5/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. ssh-config leads by 22.3 points. ssh-config is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. lrtable is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
79.8
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance96
Documentation80
vs
57.5
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation30

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric ssh-config lrtable
Trust Score79.8/10057.5/100
GradeB+C
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance9650
Documentation8030
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

ssh-config leads with a trust score of 79.8/100 compared to lrtable's 57.5/100 (a 22.3-point difference). ssh-config scores higher on maintenance (96 vs 50). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

ssh-config leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to lrtable's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

ssh-config demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (96/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

ssh-config has better documentation (80/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

ssh-config has 0 GitHub stars while lrtable has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ssh-config if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose lrtable if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from ssh-config to lrtable (or vice versa)

When migrating between ssh-config and lrtable, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: ssh-config (uncategorized) and lrtable (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ssh-config safety report and lrtable safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: ssh-config has 0 stars and lrtable has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
ssh-config Safety Report lrtable Safety Report ssh-config Alternatives lrtable Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ssh-config or lrtable?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ssh-config has a trust score of 79.8/100 (B+) while lrtable scores 57.5/100 (C). The 22.3-point difference suggests ssh-config has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do ssh-config and lrtable compare on security?
ssh-config has a security score of 90/100 and lrtable scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. ssh-config's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while lrtable's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use ssh-config or lrtable?
The choice depends on your requirements. ssh-config (uncategorized, 0 stars) and lrtable (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, ssh-config scores 79.8/100 and lrtable scores 57.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 30), and maintenance activity (96 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-05 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy