toolhive vs SwapRadar — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and SwapRadar. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) while SwapRadar scores 60.2/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. SwapRadar leads by 60.2 points. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars. SwapRadar is a infrastructure agent with 0 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
60.2
E
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars0
Sourceerc8004
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric toolhive SwapRadar
Trust Score0.0/10060.2/100
GradeAE
Stars1,6100
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security1N/A
Compliance85N/A
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

SwapRadar leads with a trust score of 60.2/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 60.2-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. toolhive scores 1 and SwapRadar scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while SwapRadar has 0. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose SwapRadar if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from toolhive to SwapRadar (or vice versa)

When migrating between toolhive and SwapRadar, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and SwapRadar (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and SwapRadar safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and SwapRadar has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
toolhive Safety Report SwapRadar Safety Report toolhive Alternatives SwapRadar Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, toolhive or SwapRadar?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, toolhive has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while SwapRadar scores 60.2/100 (E). The 60.2-point difference suggests SwapRadar has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do toolhive and SwapRadar compare on security?
toolhive has a security score of 1/100 and SwapRadar scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. toolhive's compliance score is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A), while SwapRadar's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use toolhive or SwapRadar?
The choice depends on your requirements. toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) and SwapRadar (infrastructure, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, toolhive scores 0.0/100 and SwapRadar scores 60.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-02 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy