toolhive vs trustgraph — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and trustgraph. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) while trustgraph scores 67.2/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. trustgraph leads by 67.2 points. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars. trustgraph is a infrastructure agent with 1,302 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
67.2
B
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,302
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric toolhive trustgraph
Trust Score0.0/10067.2/100
GradeAB
Stars1,6101,302
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security11
Compliance8587
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

trustgraph leads with a trust score of 67.2/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 67.2-point difference). trustgraph scores higher on compliance (87 vs 85). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 1,302 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

toolhive leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to trustgraph's 1/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while trustgraph has 1,302. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Larger community (1,610 vs 1,302 stars)

Choose trustgraph if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from toolhive to trustgraph (or vice versa)

When migrating between toolhive and trustgraph, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and trustgraph (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and trustgraph safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and trustgraph has 1,302. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
toolhive Safety Report trustgraph Safety Report toolhive Alternatives trustgraph Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, toolhive or trustgraph?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, toolhive has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while trustgraph scores 67.2/100 (B). The 67.2-point difference suggests trustgraph has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do toolhive and trustgraph compare on security?
toolhive has a security score of 1/100 and trustgraph scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. toolhive's compliance score is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A), while trustgraph's is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use toolhive or trustgraph?
The choice depends on your requirements. toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) and trustgraph (infrastructure, 1,302 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, toolhive scores 0.0/100 and trustgraph scores 67.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-05 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy