toolhive vs Waldur — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and Waldur. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) while Waldur scores 63.5/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. Waldur leads by 63.5 points. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars. Waldur is a infrastructure agent with 2 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
63.5
E
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars2
Sourcepulsemcp
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric toolhive Waldur
Trust Score0.0/10063.5/100
GradeAE
Stars1,6102
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security1N/A
Compliance85N/A
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

Waldur leads with a trust score of 63.5/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 63.5-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 2 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. toolhive scores 1 and Waldur scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while Waldur has 2. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 2 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose Waldur if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from toolhive to Waldur (or vice versa)

When migrating between toolhive and Waldur, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and Waldur (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and Waldur safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and Waldur has 2. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
toolhive Safety Report Waldur Safety Report toolhive Alternatives Waldur Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, toolhive or Waldur?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, toolhive has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while Waldur scores 63.5/100 (E). The 63.5-point difference suggests Waldur has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do toolhive and Waldur compare on security?
toolhive has a security score of 1/100 and Waldur scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. toolhive's compliance score is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Waldur's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use toolhive or Waldur?
The choice depends on your requirements. toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) and Waldur (infrastructure, 2 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, toolhive scores 0.0/100 and Waldur scores 63.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-23 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy