toolhive vs xc-mcp — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and xc-mcp. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | toolhive | xc-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 0.0/100 | 69.3/100 |
| Grade | A | C |
| Stars | 1,610 | 58 |
| Category | infrastructure | devops |
| Security | 1 | 0 |
| Compliance | 85 | 100 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | minimal |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
xc-mcp leads with a trust score of 69.3/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 69.3-point difference). xc-mcp scores higher on compliance (100 vs 85). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 58 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
toolhive leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to xc-mcp's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while xc-mcp has 58. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose toolhive if you need:
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Larger community (1,610 vs 58 stars)
Choose xc-mcp if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Switching from toolhive to xc-mcp (or vice versa)
When migrating between toolhive and xc-mcp, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and xc-mcp (devops) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and xc-mcp safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and xc-mcp has 58. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-11-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.