toolhive vs XPRTL MCP — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and XPRTL MCP. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) while XPRTL MCP scores 63.8/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. XPRTL MCP leads by 63.8 points. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars. XPRTL MCP is a infrastructure agent with 3 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
63.8
E
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars3
Sourceerc8004
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric toolhive XPRTL MCP
Trust Score0.0/10063.8/100
GradeAE
Stars1,6103
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security1N/A
Compliance85N/A
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

XPRTL MCP leads with a trust score of 63.8/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 63.8-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 3 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. toolhive scores 1 and XPRTL MCP scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while XPRTL MCP has 3. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 3 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose XPRTL MCP if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from toolhive to XPRTL MCP (or vice versa)

When migrating between toolhive and XPRTL MCP, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and XPRTL MCP (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and XPRTL MCP safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and XPRTL MCP has 3. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
toolhive Safety Report XPRTL MCP Safety Report toolhive Alternatives XPRTL MCP Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, toolhive or XPRTL MCP?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, toolhive has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while XPRTL MCP scores 63.8/100 (E). The 63.8-point difference suggests XPRTL MCP has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do toolhive and XPRTL MCP compare on security?
toolhive has a security score of 1/100 and XPRTL MCP scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. toolhive's compliance score is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A), while XPRTL MCP's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use toolhive or XPRTL MCP?
The choice depends on your requirements. toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) and XPRTL MCP (infrastructure, 3 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, toolhive scores 0.0/100 and XPRTL MCP scores 63.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy