toolhive vs zhangdi — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of toolhive and zhangdi. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) while zhangdi scores 62.2/100 (E) on the Nerq Trust Score. zhangdi leads by 62.2 points. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars. zhangdi is a infrastructure agent with 1 stars.
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
62.2
E
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1
Sourceerc8004
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric toolhive zhangdi
Trust Score0.0/10062.2/100
GradeAE
Stars1,6101
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security1N/A
Compliance85N/A
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

zhangdi leads with a trust score of 62.2/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 62.2-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 1 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. toolhive scores 1 and zhangdi scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

toolhive has 1,610 GitHub stars while zhangdi has 1. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 1 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose zhangdi if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from toolhive to zhangdi (or vice versa)

When migrating between toolhive and zhangdi, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: toolhive (infrastructure) and zhangdi (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the toolhive safety report and zhangdi safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: toolhive has 1,610 stars and zhangdi has 1. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
toolhive Safety Report zhangdi Safety Report toolhive Alternatives zhangdi Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, toolhive or zhangdi?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, toolhive has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while zhangdi scores 62.2/100 (E). The 62.2-point difference suggests zhangdi has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do toolhive and zhangdi compare on security?
toolhive has a security score of 1/100 and zhangdi scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. toolhive's compliance score is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A), while zhangdi's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use toolhive or zhangdi?
The choice depends on your requirements. toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) and zhangdi (infrastructure, 1 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, toolhive scores 0.0/100 and zhangdi scores 62.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy