stoa vs atty — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of stoa and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | stoa | atty |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 0.0/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Grade | D | C |
| Stars | 1 | 0 |
| Category | infrastructure | uncategorized |
| Security | 0 | 60 |
| Compliance | N/A | N/A |
| Maintenance | 1 | 50 |
| Documentation | 1 | 40 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
atty leads with a trust score of 55.8/100 compared to stoa's 0.0/100 (a 55.8-point difference). atty scores higher on security (60 vs 0), maintenance (50 vs 1). However, stoa has stronger community adoption (1 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
atty leads on security with a score of 60/100 compared to stoa's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
atty demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
atty has better documentation (40/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
stoa has 1 GitHub stars while atty has 0. stoa has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose stoa if you need:
- Larger community (1 vs 0 stars)
Choose atty if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from stoa to atty (or vice versa)
When migrating between stoa and atty, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: stoa (infrastructure) and atty (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the stoa safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: stoa has 1 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-10-04 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.