struf_derive vs atty — Trust Score Comparison

Name: struf_derive vs atty Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of struf_derive and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

struf_derive scores 46.2/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. atty leads by 9.6 points. struf_derive is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. atty is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

struf_derive

46.2

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcecrates

Security90

Maintenance50

Documentation30

atty

55.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcecrates

Security60

Maintenance50

Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	struf_derive	atty
Trust Score	46.2/100	55.8/100
Grade	D	C
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	60
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	50	50
Documentation	30	40
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

atty leads with a trust score of 55.8/100 compared to struf_derive's 46.2/100 (a 9.6-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

struf_derive leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to atty's 60/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

struf_derive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

atty has better documentation (40/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

struf_derive has 0 GitHub stars while atty has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose struf_derive if you need:

Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities

Choose atty if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from struf_derive to atty (or vice versa)

When migrating between struf_derive and atty, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: struf_derive (uncategorized) and atty (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the struf_derive safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: struf_derive has 0 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

struf_derive Safety Report atty Safety Report struf_derive Alternatives atty Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, struf_derive or atty?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, struf_derive has a trust score of 46.2/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C). The 9.6-point difference suggests atty has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do struf_derive and atty compare on security?

struf_derive has a security score of 90/100 and atty scores 60/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. struf_derive's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while atty's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use struf_derive or atty?

The choice depends on your requirements. struf_derive (uncategorized, 0 stars) and atty (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, struf_derive scores 46.2/100 and atty scores 55.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (30 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-20 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.