supabase-mcp vs linear-claude-skill — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of supabase-mcp and linear-claude-skill. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

supabase-mcp scores 76.1/100 (B) while linear-claude-skill scores 76.2/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. supabase-mcp is a infrastructure tool with 2,477 stars, Nerq Verified. linear-claude-skill is a coding tool with 42 stars, Nerq Verified.
76.1
B verified
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars2,477
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation0
vs
76.2
B verified
Categorycoding
Stars42
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric supabase-mcp linear-claude-skill
Trust Score76.1/10076.2/100
GradeBB
Stars2,47742
Categoryinfrastructurecoding
Security00
Compliance87100
Maintenance11
Documentation01
EU AI Act Riskminimalminimal
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

supabase-mcp (76.1) and linear-claude-skill (76.2) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

supabase-mcp leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to linear-claude-skill's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

supabase-mcp demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

linear-claude-skill has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

supabase-mcp has 2,477 GitHub stars while linear-claude-skill has 42. supabase-mcp has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose supabase-mcp if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (2,477 vs 42 stars)

Choose linear-claude-skill if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from supabase-mcp to linear-claude-skill (or vice versa)

When migrating between supabase-mcp and linear-claude-skill, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: supabase-mcp (infrastructure) and linear-claude-skill (coding) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the supabase-mcp safety report and linear-claude-skill safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: supabase-mcp has 2,477 stars and linear-claude-skill has 42. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
supabase-mcp Safety Report linear-claude-skill Safety Report supabase-mcp Alternatives linear-claude-skill Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, supabase-mcp or linear-claude-skill?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, supabase-mcp has a trust score of 76.1/100 (B) while linear-claude-skill scores 76.2/100 (B). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do supabase-mcp and linear-claude-skill compare on security?
supabase-mcp has a security score of 0/100 and linear-claude-skill scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. supabase-mcp's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while linear-claude-skill's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use supabase-mcp or linear-claude-skill?
The choice depends on your requirements. supabase-mcp (infrastructure, 2,477 stars) and linear-claude-skill (coding, 42 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, supabase-mcp scores 76.1/100 and linear-claude-skill scores 76.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-04-05 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy