TextFlow vs atty — Trust Score Comparison

Name: TextFlow vs atty Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of TextFlow and atty. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

TextFlow scores 0.0/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. atty leads by 55.8 points. TextFlow is a uncategorized agent with 1 stars. atty is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

TextFlow

0.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars1

Sourcehuggingface_full

Compliance100

atty

55.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcecrates

Security60

Maintenance50

Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	TextFlow	atty
Trust Score	0.0/100	55.8/100
Grade	D	C
Stars	1	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	N/A	60
Compliance	100	N/A
Maintenance	N/A	50
Documentation	N/A	40
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

atty leads with a trust score of 55.8/100 compared to TextFlow's 0.0/100 (a 55.8-point difference). However, TextFlow has stronger community adoption (1 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. TextFlow scores N/A and atty scores 60 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. TextFlow: N/A, atty: 50.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. TextFlow: N/A, atty: 40.

Community & Adoption

TextFlow has 1 GitHub stars while atty has 0. TextFlow has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose TextFlow if you need:

Larger community (1 vs 0 stars)

Choose atty if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from TextFlow to atty (or vice versa)

When migrating between TextFlow and atty, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: TextFlow (uncategorized) and atty (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the TextFlow safety report and atty safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: TextFlow has 1 stars and atty has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

TextFlow Safety Report atty Safety Report TextFlow Alternatives atty Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, TextFlow or atty?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, TextFlow has a trust score of 0.0/100 (D) while atty scores 55.8/100 (C). The 55.8-point difference suggests atty has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do TextFlow and atty compare on security?

TextFlow has a security score of N/A/100 and atty scores 60/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. TextFlow's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while atty's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use TextFlow or atty?

The choice depends on your requirements. TextFlow (uncategorized, 1 stars) and atty (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, TextFlow scores 0.0/100 and atty scores 55.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 40), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-07-30 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.