tileserver-gl vs extension-subscript — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of tileserver-gl and extension-subscript. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

tileserver-gl scores 72.5/100 (B) while extension-subscript scores 82.5/100 (A-) on the Nerq Trust Score. extension-subscript leads by 10.0 points. tileserver-gl is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. extension-subscript is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
72.5
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation65
vs
82.5
A- verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric tileserver-gl extension-subscript
Trust Score72.5/10082.5/100
GradeBA-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance100100
Documentation6570
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

extension-subscript leads with a trust score of 82.5/100 compared to tileserver-gl's 72.5/100 (a 10.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

tileserver-gl leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to extension-subscript's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

tileserver-gl demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 100/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

extension-subscript has better documentation (70/100 vs 65/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

tileserver-gl has 0 GitHub stars while extension-subscript has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose tileserver-gl if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose extension-subscript if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from tileserver-gl to extension-subscript (or vice versa)

When migrating between tileserver-gl and extension-subscript, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: tileserver-gl (uncategorized) and extension-subscript (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the tileserver-gl safety report and extension-subscript safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: tileserver-gl has 0 stars and extension-subscript has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
tileserver-gl Safety Report extension-subscript Safety Report tileserver-gl Alternatives extension-subscript Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, tileserver-gl or extension-subscript?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, tileserver-gl has a trust score of 72.5/100 (B) while extension-subscript scores 82.5/100 (A-). The 10.0-point difference suggests extension-subscript has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do tileserver-gl and extension-subscript compare on security?
tileserver-gl has a security score of 90/100 and extension-subscript scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. tileserver-gl's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while extension-subscript's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use tileserver-gl or extension-subscript?
The choice depends on your requirements. tileserver-gl (uncategorized, 0 stars) and extension-subscript (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, tileserver-gl scores 72.5/100 and extension-subscript scores 82.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 70), and maintenance activity (100 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy