cognee vs uglycode — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of cognee and uglycode. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

cognee scores 0.0/100 (A) while uglycode scores 64.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. uglycode leads by 64.0 points. cognee is a coding agent with 12,475 stars. uglycode is a coding agent with 0 stars.
0.0
A
Categorycoding
Stars12,475
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
64.0
C
Categorycoding
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric cognee uglycode
Trust Score0.0/10064.0/100
GradeAC
Stars12,4750
Categorycodingcoding
Security10
Compliance10087
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

uglycode leads with a trust score of 64.0/100 compared to cognee's 0.0/100 (a 64.0-point difference). uglycode scores higher on maintenance (1 vs 1). However, cognee has stronger community adoption (12,475 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

cognee leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to uglycode's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

uglycode demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

cognee has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

cognee has 12,475 GitHub stars while uglycode has 0. cognee has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose cognee if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Larger community (12,475 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose uglycode if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from cognee to uglycode (or vice versa)

When migrating between cognee and uglycode, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: cognee (coding) and uglycode (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the cognee safety report and uglycode safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: cognee has 12,475 stars and uglycode has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
cognee Safety Report uglycode Safety Report cognee Alternatives uglycode Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, cognee or uglycode?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, cognee has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while uglycode scores 64.0/100 (C). The 64.0-point difference suggests uglycode has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do cognee and uglycode compare on security?
cognee has a security score of 1/100 and uglycode scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. cognee's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while uglycode's is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use cognee or uglycode?
The choice depends on your requirements. cognee (coding, 12,475 stars) and uglycode (coding, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, cognee scores 0.0/100 and uglycode scores 64.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy